Comments on Anna Von Reitz

 

A good friend of mine has gotten out of "the system" and is encouraging me to do the same in order to add to members of a local Jural Society that can clean up the mess we are in with massive fraud and theft.

He gave me this pdf article from Anna Von Reitz which I read and would like to critique here.

I still don't trust her because of the incomplete way she presents her case.  Her articles are usually pretty long and she leans a lot on logic, rarely sites her evidence and sources in a way that is easy to verify yet her style and arguments on the surface are quite compelling.

For Example:

"We have assessed damages of $279 Trillion dollars against the American Bar Association..."

How did you come across that number?  How do you hold that sum against the Bar Association?  Is that the sum total of what they have charged for their services?  If not, how do you tie the national debt to the lawyers?  Did they conceive of the system we have or were they just tools used by others to construct it?  Are all memebers of the Bar Association(s) even aware of what they are doing?  How can they be held to such a respnsibility with justice?

Almost all her articles are really about one thing, attempting to show and prove that there is a massive conspiracy of fraud being perpetrated on the US and global public that has turned a free nation into a slave state and is enslaving the world.

There is no denying this fact.  We can clearly see, if we look, that UPPERCASE NAMES are being used on all our official documents such as birth certificates, deeds, licenses, IRS forms, etc. and many of these are different from each other, likely representing different secret trusts that are named in a way to make one think that the trust is us.  The legal definition of "person" adds to the obvious deception and one can look on any bank printed check to see the micro print of the signature line that says "authorized agent" over and over - meaning clearly that our signature is NOT  the UPPER CASE name in the upper right corner.

The fraud can easily be proved.

The problem is, who committed this fraud with willful and cogent intent is a very hard thing to prove.  The people that do this evil are very clever and always have plausable denyability in place to protect themselves. The criminals we face that have perpitrated and continued this obvious fraud are not lawful and will not comply with any legal or logical or moral argument that would rob them of their booty or stop them from continuing to steal from all of us.  Even when congress passes a law, do they even understand or have time to read and digest and research it?  All laws they pass are written by lawyers who know how to keep themselves safe from the laws they craft and then present, usually in a rush, to the congressional member who is ill-equiped to fully comprehend what they are voting on and are almost universally in bondage to blackmail or bribes to stay in office.  The corruption goes completely down to the comman person that has no clue what voting is and most don't even bother to research who they are voting for much less understand that voting is different than being a lawful elector.

Anna's arguments go clear back to King Henry the 8th and she asserts that there are convicting documents in the Vatican that can prove the complicity of the Popes of the past - yet she can't get those documents into court or reproduce them for the public.

The sheer volume of her long articles (3800 she says in the referenced pdf) are not only long, and highly repetitive but also lack coherence and cross references.  To have an effective argument, Anna needs to take every issue that needs proof and create a concise and focused breif on that one point and then link to it from her higher level arguments.  It may be easier to do such a fix by starting all over and using what she has already published as a reference.  The more words one uses in an argument the more likely one is to lose their audience.

Anna argues that the common law is where the true law is, and this is undeniably true.  Yet the common law is based on the Bible and she rarely if ever presents arguments from this true and authoritative source.

The Bible does not say we as men will solve the problem of sin which is the root cause of all crime.  Consider these verses:

Matt 5:10 Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake....

Romans 5: 3-4: ... but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope.

1 Cor 14: 11-13: Even unto this present hour we both hunger, and thirst, and are naked, and are buffeted, and have no certain dwelling place; And labour, working with our own hands: being reviled, we bless; being persecuted, we suffer it: Being defamed, we intreat: we are made as the filth of the world, and are the offscouring of all things unto this day.

2 Sam 23 : 6-8 : But the sons of Belial shall be all of them as thorns thrust away, because they cannot be taken with hands: But the man that shall touch them must be fenced with iron and the staff of a spear; and they shall be utterly burned with fire in the same place.

Rev 19:15: And out of his [God's] mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

Rev 2:10-11: Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death.

There is nothing in the Bible that indicates that we men will overcome the sin of the world.  This is God's job and to His Glory.

I am not saying here that we shouldn't try to fix the world but that it is not possible to eradicate the true cause, sin, from this earth.  We will suffer in this life, that is a promise in the Bible. 

The Common Law is the best we have to approach heaven on earth but it is not the solution to the problem, Christ is.

The image of the golden statue of Nebachadnezar in Daniel ends with a rock from the sky blowing the entire Babylonian system to bits - this is not a man-sourced thing.

The time of the millenium in Revelation happens when God comes to rule man personally on the earth with a rod of iron.  It is not by a self-repenting world that finally comes to its senses and begins to do things lawfully.

Anna asks us to abandon all ties to the fictious entities that we were born into and leaves us as men without a country in the hopes of winning a war against corruption that has never been fully accomplished in history.  If that war is not won, where does it leave the man without a country?  Better or worse off?

Anna claims to be a supreme court justice but does not disclose to us how many people elected her and the distinction between the state which she works for and the State of Alaska - which she doesn't work for.  She has reduced her use of this position to add to her own credibility but basically, she is not what at first she would appear to be.

Yes we generate all the true wealth but if a thief comes into your home and steals something and you don't know where that property is or who took it, can you ever recover that property without yourself comitting a crime?  You could yell that somebody owes you relief - but who exactly?  If the gold that was stolen from us in 1933 is all melted down and changes hands - how do we ever identify OUR gold that was stolen from us?  We weren't all robbed of the same amount of gold and silver. Some are owed more than others - how can this ever be determined?

Anna - make your arguments as concise and complete as you can. Prove every point beyond a shadow of a doubt and make it super easy to verify.  Identify who the criminals are by name and then present it to the authorities and the public.

Stop just saying the same arguments over and over and over.  They will not change anything till an audience can fully comprehend and prove you are correct.

Perhaps God may raise an army to accomplish this massive correction and perhaps He will use the works of men to accomplish this, but I doubt it because:

Deut 4:24: For the Lord thy God is a consuming fire, even a jealous God.