On Slavery

It's finally time for another post on this blog.
It has taken a back burner due to the fact that I now have to work again to pay my taxes!!!

Anyway this post: http://www.dougwils.com/The-Bible-Culture-and-Race/patrickt-qnostradamusq-henry.html prompted me write this.

The referenced post is Doug Wilson explaining the Federal Vision debate status to people.  Doug has taken a lot of flack for touching this discussion because it touches a particularly sensitive topic - slavery.

I have long had thoughts on this and they have evolved as I have been working on an idea to replace or supplement government with a social website.  In doing so I have come to re-think my ideas about slavery.

First of all, I want to say that slavery is wrong.

But before we can say that in a sense that has true meaning we must answer two important questions.

1) What IS slavery?
2) Why is it wrong?

Working Definition of Slavery:
Slavery is a state of being where a human being has his normally lawful options limited by the will of another.  Slavery can be partial, temporary, and imperceptible as well as overt and complete.

Why is this wrong?
IF: All men are created equal
THEN:

• The authority for all behavior comes from the creator.
• IF: That creator is the God of the Bible
• THEN
1. The biblical law applies
2. The basic law to love your neighbor applies
3.  Slavery is antithetical to loving your neighbor

THEREFORE: Slavery is wrong.

If you don't subscribe to creation and the God of the Bible you have NO AUTHORITY to mark it as wrong, regardless of what you feel is right.

Why is Slavery RIGHT?!!
But even within this framework of belief, there is a solid argument FOR slavery.

Slavery is an efficient deterrent to crime if used as a form of punishment for crime.
Slavery is a possible way to restore damage to another even if you're broke.
Slavery is an opportunity for the Master to show mercy to the slave.
Slavery is cost efficient to society if used as a form of punishment.

So here's an example scenario where I think Slavery might well be appropriate:

Johnny is a little drunk and takes his Dads car and decides to take it for a spin.  While driving with his friends and showing off, he accidentally hits and kills a little girl running in the street to get her ball.
Johnny is devastated.
The girls parents take Johnny into court to prosecute him.
But what can her parents gain by punishing Johnny?  How can Johnny possibly ever restore to the girls parents what he has destroyed?
The court could fine him, but how much?
The court could imprison him - but now the girls parents get to pay taxes to support Johnny - hardly a good compensation.
The court could have Johnny killed - actually the most biblical sentence I think in this case, but what a tragedy - how does another death make the first one better?
OR
TADA!
Johnny could become a slave to the girls parents for as long as the parents want him as a slave.
At any time, if Johnny is a bad slave, he can be put to death.
But if Johnny accepts his sentence as a man and does his best to serve the girl's parents in love to atone for his mistake, well he is doing several things:

• He IS supporting the victims of his crime
• He IS being made to think about the consequences of his actions every day.
• He IS being a productive person in society

After 5 years of superb service, the girl's parents realize that their daughter can never come back.  They also realize that Johnny sincerely is sorry and has fully repented of his irresponsible ways.
The girls parents decide to grant Johnny mercy and truncate his sentence as their slave. 
Johnny is now fully restored to society and his debt is forgiven and partially paid.
Relationship is restored and the best possible outcome is achieved.

There is one more point about Slavery I would like to make.

We are all slaves right now!
Remember that Slavery can be imperceptible and partial.  Every mala-prohibita rule that we are made to obey is partial slavery.  It was the same for the Israelites enslaved by Pharisaical laws which Jesus opposed so strongly.  In fact many of these rules we think we are to obey are not even applicable to us except that we have been tricked into acting on behalf of a legal fiction created for us by government by fraud.  (Google:"Strawman Birth Certificate" for details on this.) This trick is used to separate us from our God-given rights by contract.
Through miss-education and outright fraud, we are now in Slavery Version 2.0.

It is quite ironic and interesting that the original 13th ammendment to the constitution was burried at the same time overt slavery was outlawed.  See another post on this blog about that ammendment.

If you don't think you are a slave, see what happens when you don't pay your voluntary taxes.  See what happens if you try to do a business without a license.  See what happens if you try to operate an unregistered automobile without a drivers license.

An I hope you haven't swallowed that pre-crime public-safety arguement as the necessity for our slavery - that is utter BS and there is no lawful basis for it.  Safe and Free can NEVER BE!

Yes Slavery is wrong and bad but we are living in it right now.  It isn't overt or complete but it is UNBOUNDED and GROWING.

Something to think about.

Cheers!
 

Principles In Liberty 15

Ever obtained a water right? Ever think about what this implies?

Download

Summary:
Recorded on 3/12/2008

A discussion of a situation that arose concerning water rights I requested for my property.
Eclesasties 7:7 "Surely opression maketh a wise man mad; and a gift destroyeth the heart"
What does needing a license to use water imply?
Am I free or a slave?
Check it out.

Here is my original email to the Idaho Dept. of Water Resources:

I received a permit review from you regarding my water right permit #81-07152

It appears that my addition of a hydro power system utilizing available spring runoff water which included a diversion of spring water flow to collect it for this use requires the permit request to be amended

This is the first water right I have ever had an interest in so please forgive me if my questions are that of a simpleton.

What does the term "Water Right" mean? It would appear that this is not a right at all but a privilege granted by the state to the licensee via the permitting process.
Since the term "license" implies permission to do something that would otherwise be illegal, why is it otherwise illegal to use water on property I hold clear fee-simple title to?
Do I own a license referenced by this permit? If so, what constitutes proof of my license? All I have in my possession is a form showing I have applied for a permit. How can I possess proof of my license? It appears my license is not yet perfected either so what should I assume is the status of permission to use this privilege?
If I am required to have a license to use water that is naturally flowing on my property am I to assume that it is illegal to use any water on my land without a license? Does this include rainwater that falls from the sky before it touches the land?
I have several ponds I have created on my property and I have been told I need a permit in order to obtain fish to stock them. What is the nature of such a permit? I have heard that obtaining a permit for ponds is actually me granting jurisdiction to the issuer of the permit rather than obtaining permission to use that which I do not own. Can you clarify how exactly obtaining a permit of this type effects my ownership rights and standing WRT the state?
Are there any licenses implied simply by holding fee simple title to the land which I should be aware of? Is fee-simple title ownership at all or is it merely a declaration of an interest in something I cannot own?
If I do not own the water on my land, even with a "water right" then who does? Is water ownership in the hands of a single entity or spread out across multiple entities?
Since water flows onto and off of my land and eventually encompasses the globe and is generally neither created nor destroyed, how can it be owned at all by any entity other than all mankind? How did the state come to acquire ownership rights over such a resource?
It appears that it is a condition for approval that the hydropower I extract from the water be subordinate to any other use - why? Does the state also own any power generated by this licensed resource?
It appears that the Director of Water Resources will require some 6 years or more to review this license - why such a long time? By default am I to assume I have the privilege granted until so denied? Can I be held liable for making such an assumption?
My "rights" may be revoked or amended it seems at any future time so how is this a "right" in any sense of the word? Why is the state even bothering with all this paperwork - why does it not simply declare itself the sovereign over all water and dispense with all pretence of rights or ownership by individuals?
Who determines the "interest of the public"? Is the Director (or whoever this entity would be) subject to public election or recall? How am I represented here? Is the entity held under any kind of oath?
Should I have asked permission prior to diverting the water for hydro power use? Who would I ask and what process would I use? What would be the limits to my liability for not asking premission?
I would like to create a dam on Cedar Creek on my property for the use of environmental enhancement, water conservation, and more hydro power. How would I proceed to acquire permission to do such a project? If such a project were done, would I have any control or rights over the fruit of my labor or the power generated by the dam?
Do I have any rights to the air I breathe? Who owns that? If it is not collectively owned by the state as water appears to be, how does air differ from water in this respect?
Can I assume my body is my own or do state regulations on health care imply that I don't own that either?
Do I have any rights at all? If so what rights to I have beyond being a slave?
Do I own anything in absolute alodial title? If so, what might that be? If I can obtain alodial title to anything, how would I go about doing so?
Is the fruit of my labor and intelligence also owned by another besides God? If so, who would this be and why? How did I come to be a slave?
I think everything in your letter is in order as far as I can figure out. I am thus signing your "application for amendment" and tendering the $50 fee as requested. Its nice to know that my government is serving me so well by only charging me only $50 to process this paperwork and maybe granting me a license sometime after December 28th, 2014 which is revocable at any time. I stand humbly grateful for your imperial favor on my behalf.



Truly I am not trying to be trite or smart here - with all due respect, I wish to understand how this circumstance is even possible in a republican system under law.

I realize some of these questions are a bit philosophical but one must realize that the requests you are making of me in this letter imply some very disturbing truths. If all water on all lands are owned by the state/public I would think I need a license to drink it and thus to live. This implies nothing less than the fact that totalitarian communism as our current form of government. This also implies I am nothing more than a slave and can be subject to starvation, dehydration, or asphyxiation at the state's whim. Quite disturbing in a place once known as "the land of the free and the home of the brave" don’t you think?

Thank you so much Mr. Weaver for your time.
Sincerely
Your humble servant (literally)
Me