Showing posts with label Attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attorneys. Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2015

Another open letter to my congressman


I use this blog as a way to make a decent sized communication with my congressman possible and to keep a record of what I told him - neither feature of which is supported by the standard lame congressional webpage communications form.  By referencing this blog article in his communication form, I can articulate to him and anyone else that is interested, what I said.

This letter addresses our recent fire issues in the Kamiah, Kooskia area.

8/21/2015

Dear Congressman Labrador,

The devastation that happened in Kamiah over the past week is, I believe, primarily caused by government control and ownership of our lands and fire response systems.  

I know a friend in the area that took pictures of one of the original fires when it was only a few acres in size and called it in at that time.  I understand that the lightning storm ignited many fires that day so I don't mean to oversimplify things, but the response time was days and that very fire took out many homes itself.  Citizens that might have taken action upon seeing the fire did not. Why?  Because they had a professional, well funded firefighting force paid for by their taxes to do that job for them.

From attending various fire meetings and discussing the situation with long time locals, it appears to me there is a callous and infectious tendency towards egotistical isolationism.  People with information don't share it and it appears that the reason is that information is power.  People with authority don't delegate it empower others to act for fear of losing 'control'.  Even our local volunteer fire teams have a superior attitude toward non-professional paid firefighters. 

I heard of a situation where a local fire team was contacting the state to get assistance and the state team was more concerned with where the local team got a state-owned radio than they were with getting assistance on the fire.

I was told that $5 million was spent by government on the fire before a single professional firefighter engaged a single fire.

I have also heard of many stories of professional firefighters getting in the way or blocking progress or ordering people off a fire or simply standing and watching and sometimes mocking or laughing at local non-paid firefighters.

I think the problem is clear - when you pay someone to do a job like firefighting on an hourly basis with lucrative rates, you create people that 'manage' the fire instead of teams that 'kill' fires on contact.  The motivation becomes to actually create enough property damage to get the situation into the lucrative 'emergency status' which enables a locality to legally plunder the entire nation.  It is the communist idea of 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need'.

I can understand this is a very complex problem.  How do you motivate professionals to 'work themselves out of a job'?  It's a problem that I think fits exactly the proper role of a good legislator - don't make laws to solve problems, make laws to allow and motivate individuals to solve them for themselves.

So here is my two-cent solution to our problem:

Let's pay firefighters a percentage of what they now earn hourly so they can take care of themselves while fighting fires.  Then, after the emergency is over, calculate the lost tax revenue for a year caused by the fire using the previous years data and subtract that from the remainder percentage they would receive had no loss of property been done by the fire.

In other words, if a team of professional firefighters engages a fire and put it out and only lose, say, a field of hay, the previous year's tax revenue that field yielded to the county is split between the team members and deducted from the remainder of the pay they are to receive.

This motivates every single professional firefighter to be as efficient as possible and encourages reasonable risk to accomplish the goal.  If a fire gets big, the team gets larger and the losses are shared but not equally.  The people that were on the fire when it was small pay for the damage the small fires caused and those that arrived later pay for the damage that was caused on their watch shared with all that are fighting the fire.  Everyone at all times is motivated to stop the damage - not manage the fire into lucrative profits.

Loss of life is not calculated here but needs to be added in.  If a person dies due to a professional firefighter decision, no bonus is given to the people responsible.  This creates a strong incentive for safety yet allows risks to be taken if needed without extreme consequences for an honest mistake.

Another serious problem our firefighters deal with is tort issues.  Allowing a civilian to actively take part in fighting a fire incurs a huge risk in the legal realm to whoever makes that decision.  A lawyer can take your life from you for an honest mistake - this is the ever increasing weakness of our nation - a loss of justice and common sense in judicial review with ridiculous consequences that hamper risk taking and effective operations.

The solution to this problem, as is discussed at length elsewhere in this blog, is really a return to the common law way of doing things.  The main solution being the un-meddled with, randomly and frequently chosen, jury.  The power of deciding constitutionality should be with the people, not with a judge.  The final say in a case should be with the jury not with a judge.  Appeals are costly and flawed in that they rarely get at real justice and often thwart it and delay justice being done.  

Why not simply hold juries accountable for their decisions by another jury and allow the case decision to be final? If you condemned an innocent man by your lame decision on a jury, you face his penalty at the hands of another jury.  The case remains finally settled but the jury pays for its mistake.  (This wouldn't be a bad idea for Judges either)

I know this is pretty radical thinking but if our justice system continues to erode into the money making machine it has become, peace and order in our society is doomed.

Tough problems I know, but we need leadership to step up and stop this trend to self destruction. Communities like Kamiah with their strong sense of honor and cooperation will be eventually destroyed by bean counters, politicians, attorneys and power jockeys.  Responsibility needs to lie with the individual and the individual needs to be empowered to make decisions freely and reap consequences dictated by their peers, not by professional paid judges.

Our fire losses are, for the most part, caused by our poor justice system and congress can fix this by limiting the jurisdiction of higher courts and empowering lower courts to use common law principles and juries.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Principles in Liberty #28

A picture I took of Glen the day of our first interview
Glen Stoll - part V

Download
Summary:
Recorded on 11/5/2008

00:30 Setting the record before you proceed with legal defence
01:00 State the facts, set the record and let God fight your battles for you.
01:26 Live in such a way that people won't believe you're guilty.
01:40 Hovind just wants to preach the Word.
02:40 The fable - the wolf and the lamb - any argument will serve a tyrant's intentions.
03:10 We are living today under tyrany.
04:30 Tyrany of the majority, Tyrany of the ruling class.
04:52 A pure Democracy is a tyrany.
05:33 US was founded as a democratic republic - Republic is based on its organic documents which were in turn based on scripture.
06:16 Oligarchy is the tyrany of the ruling class. We have a corporate government.
07:30 The Class: is the Judiciary - are the Attorneys - the vermin.
08:00 I disagree - the Attorney's are the pratorian guard of the true elite.
08:30 but to win the war you have to beat the army first.
08:45 Back to Hovind - he needs to be exonorated.
09:00 An arial survailence idea during civil war idea never got to Lincoln in time to do any good.
10:28 Kent's wife is not in jail, still awaiting an appeal.
10:47 Joe's attorneys will not let Glen help here at all.
11:20 Glen would be arrested if he showed up at the Pensicola airport. This is a threat from Joe Hovind's attorney.
12:00 Lies to keep Glen away.
12:40 Glen wrote to Jerry Barringer (Joe Hovind's attorney) who never responded to his questions. Thus Glen has concluded that Jerry has lied - Please correct me if I am wrong.
14:30 Don't anger the judge - if you have a mad judge - you have an insane judge.
15:20 I relate a case with my christian attorney.
16:30 Glen has friends that are attorneys (but just a few). They don't always know what they are doing or what the difference is between a lawyer and an attorney.
17:45 Attorneys are taught against the principles of defering powers to the church.
18:00 Seems insane for a court to rule on the document that created them.
18:48 Current status - still helping Kent, can't help Joe, Kent has said he wishes he had followed Glen's advice.
19:30 Attorneys have to give up the arguement (of jurisdiction) because that is their job.
20:00 Wives not understanding the problem.
21:00 We are schooled not to think or argue properly.
22:10 I admire Mrs. Hovind for what she has done to honor Kent.
22:37 She is caught between the fear of man and the fear of God.
23:00 The story of Epaphrus a witness so powerful his ashes were fought over between the churches.
25:00 Final saying by Glen - nobody on the staff is favorable to Glen's views due to religous dogma and bigotry.
27:27 I Cor. 13 commentary by Glen: Charity trumps all.
28:30 Church concept of authority that I have a problem with. That which is is what God wants.
30:30 Glen's theory - God did this on purpose - to make sure we would have to strive with each other and defer in love to get along.
31:30 God could easily intervine and solve all arguments - but he doesn't.
32:51 Why? Because he is more concerned with how we get along.
33:20 What is Charity? Not just love. Cheerfully giving others the benefit of the doubt and deferring to others in joy.
35:24 I witness a very cool fellowship in Idaho before Y2K. They all got along great till Y2K didn't happen.
36:25 So how does the theory cause us to get along? It reveals who and how we can get along.
38:10 I wonder how we will consume each other once the going gets tough.
38:11 Concept of the Law of the Contract - no law imparing the obligation of contract.
38:46 Argument: You can't compell me to do x because I have a contract that doesn't allow that.
39:20 You can't get into a contract that contradicts a previously entered contract.
39:40 The problem with fraud in state contracts.
40:00 Once you know the problem you need to decide what to do. If you continue to participate you concent to the contract.
41:50 Its such an inconvenience to get out of these contracts. Doing so isolates you from working with others.
42:24 Franklin: "If you are willing to give up liberty for security, you will have neigher."
42:31 Escape from Sobibor - true story.
43:37 "I would rather have died making a stand than being led to the slaughter"
44:39 "An antichrist system is any system that takes the place of Christ in your life."
45:80 "If we have submitted to an anti-christ system either by deed (the right hand) or by thought (the forehead) we have taken the mark of the beast."
46:00 Are you saying that people in the system that oppose christ are against christ? Yes.
47:35 You're not helping God by obeying him - you're helping yourself.
48:00 Should we talk about the hows of getting out of the system and staying out.
48:45 Most people suffer first and then take a stand - very view just think about it and decide to do it on moral reasons.
49:18 Glen: "I suffered a lot"
49:50 proving a negative is pretty hard.

Glen still wants to keep talking so we will see what comes next...