Showing posts with label Bill of rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill of rights. Show all posts

Friday, February 26, 2021

A Union can be dangerous

 

I wanted to respond to Dave Manley's letter to the editor last week.  Dave makes the excellent point that the founders had "criminal minds" that decided to, instead of fighting one another for power, worked together to give us the Constitution and protect our rights for future generations.  By "criminal minds" Dave meant that they understood human nature.  

Unlike the common view expressed these days that men are basically good, the Deists (being students of natural law) and the Christians alike believed that men, especially if given too much power, were basically evil.

What troubled me in Dave's letter was this common perception that our founders, like Thomas Jefferson, gave us the bill of rights and invented the idea of a constitution.  This is not true.

Patrick Henry, Mr. "give me liberty or give me death", was a delegate to the Continental Congress from Pennsylvania which had just created their own new constitution that I believe introduced the idea of enumerating what rights the government was created to protect.  Mr. Henry and his fellow delegates were given very specific instructions from their state not to allow the precious rights their new constitution protected to be compromised by a federal constitution.

Mr. Henry and his fellow delegates did NOT sign the Constitution that came out of the convention.  What they DID do was to create The Pennsylvania Minority Report (PMR) which listed 14 flaws that they saw that threatened the rights they had secured by their new state constitution.

The Bill of Rights was created by the dissenters not by the Convention.

So this brings me to a pattern I see in history and that is the pattern of forced union.  We saw in the Civil war how hard it was for the southern states to remove themselves from the union and we saw in Brexit how hard it was for Great Britain to remove themselves from the European Union and we see the natural glue that holds nations into the United Nations because if they leave they have no defense against possible sanctions the union may impose on outsiders.

This trend seems to now be pushing for a global new world order that all nations will be forced into eventually.

The PMR points out that no delegate to the Continental Congress was allowed to make amendments or alter anything in the proposed constitution.  Things were fixed before the delegates ever got there. It was Yay, Nay.  Henry and others smelled a rat and if you can find the full text of the PMR you will see there were many questionable shenanigans going on before, during, and after the Constitutional Convention pushing delegates to "take it or leave it".

Our pathetic government schools don't make our kids read the founding documents, much less the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers and much much less the constitutions of the original 13 colonies under the Articles of Confederation.  

Very few people these days have any clue that there were many good constitutions before the federal one.  The US Constitution didn't introduce this idea, it created a UNION.  There are merits to a union of course but ours was to be federated which means that the federal government deals with other nations and the states, NOT the people or counties/cities directly.  It would never have been ratified if this weren't the perception of the people at that time.

Now our federal government is a corporate socialist empire that constantly meddles with the affairs of individual citizens more so than it does with the states creating huge bureaucracies to manage dealing with millions of individuals and businesses and dictating what they can and cannot do from a central hub.  The federal government holds our medical and financial records and monitors our every phone call and email - for national security reasons creating clear vulnerabilities to our privacy and rights.

This all came out of the union.

The good things that are now happening at the state level all over this union are because the states are beginning to realize that this union is way out of line and that push-back is a good thing.  I for one hope we will see some states put in place some checks and balances needed to offset the totalitarian power of our federal government that is now so dysfunctional as to have no resemblance to the original ideas that created it.

BTW Why hasn't Biden even given a state of the Union address yet like every other president in our history has?  And why hasn't our "watch-dog" media even noticed this fact?

Monday, June 15, 2015

Who is KrisAnne Hall?

I got to hear this lady speak today at a local church.  Her topic was a Genealogy of the Constitution.  I was surprised to learn several things I had never heard before despite the fact that I have been a student of history and the constitution for many years.
See here website here.
The documents I had never heard of were:
She held these to be where our constitution and bill of rights came from.  I have argued in several of my posts that the Bill of Rights came from the Pennsylvania Minority Report.but it is quite possible that the minority group got their ideas from these documents.
This woman is such a breath of fresh air!  She fully understands the basis for liberty and the many distinctions needed to not be fooled by the demagogues into a ditch.  She could be Steve Pidgeon's sister!
Her lecture was geared towards the middle-school aged kids and so could not go into great detail but mostly just got the history right.  I know she would love Brent White's Excellence of the Common Law.
I had no time to discuss with her the path we take to get back to liberty.  I didn't know if she was familiar with the many legal problems we have like congress disbanding itself Sainai-Di at the end of the civil war, or the lost 13th amendment, or the distinction between voting and electing.  She knows we live in a de-facto universe I am sure.
She gave me much hope after a lifetime of being unsuccessful at getting many people turned around - even my own family.
Check her out.  I highly support her and her mission!

Friday, February 1, 2008

Principles In Liberty 7

More stuff from Steve Pidgeon on the legal aspects of same sex mariages and its effect on liberty.
This is a continuation from Principles In Liberty 6.

Download
Summary:
Recorded on January 31st, 2008

00:42 Lesbian mariage and the consequences for their kids
00:57 Ecconomic Assessment of same sex mariage laws report
01:25 Alliance Defence Fund email - hate speach laws being adopted in many countries
02:30 Gay vs Lesbian Mariage disolution rates, Gender influence problem
03:24 Washington State's Domestic partnership laws - privilages granted.
04:26 Meritritious relationships and probate
06:09 Domestic Partnerships created and destroyed by affidavit whereas heterosexual mariage requires several court hearings to disolve making it discriminatory by nature.
06:29 who creates mariage vs domestic partnerships, state interest in the mariage, licenses
07:50 God ordained relationships
09:00 State asserts control of mariage regardless of license.
10:13 Rights vs Privilages
12:42 Bill of Rights gives privilages just by protecting rights explicitly.
13:00 No authority greater than the state vs authority comes from God.
13:30 No God authority always results in death by government.
15:20 Scripture distinguishes between state, culture and individual. Isaiah 1:10
18:00 Codification of immoral behavior is promised wrath in scripture.
19:00 Domestic violence in the Lesbian community
19:43 MRSA virus in gay community
22:00 Logic for death penalty for homosexuality.
12:31 Mosaic law for death penalty: Leveticus 20
23:10 Cutoff from the land - nations that no longer exist.
23:30 Nineva still exists in the curds.
24:30 curses of immoral behavior from levitical law
25:10 Historical rise of homosexual cultures - society gone within 3 generations.
26:00 Homosexual behavior is the gateway to full blown pagan behavior.
26:30 S1185 - Hate crimes bill
27:00 Example: gay rights parade protest
28:20 The language of S1185 protects "Sexual Orientation". It protects perversion in general.

More comming in the next Principles In Liberty podcast...