Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

Friday, February 26, 2021

A Union can be dangerous

 

I wanted to respond to Dave Manley's letter to the editor last week.  Dave makes the excellent point that the founders had "criminal minds" that decided to, instead of fighting one another for power, worked together to give us the Constitution and protect our rights for future generations.  By "criminal minds" Dave meant that they understood human nature.  

Unlike the common view expressed these days that men are basically good, the Deists (being students of natural law) and the Christians alike believed that men, especially if given too much power, were basically evil.

What troubled me in Dave's letter was this common perception that our founders, like Thomas Jefferson, gave us the bill of rights and invented the idea of a constitution.  This is not true.

Patrick Henry, Mr. "give me liberty or give me death", was a delegate to the Continental Congress from Pennsylvania which had just created their own new constitution that I believe introduced the idea of enumerating what rights the government was created to protect.  Mr. Henry and his fellow delegates were given very specific instructions from their state not to allow the precious rights their new constitution protected to be compromised by a federal constitution.

Mr. Henry and his fellow delegates did NOT sign the Constitution that came out of the convention.  What they DID do was to create The Pennsylvania Minority Report (PMR) which listed 14 flaws that they saw that threatened the rights they had secured by their new state constitution.

The Bill of Rights was created by the dissenters not by the Convention.

So this brings me to a pattern I see in history and that is the pattern of forced union.  We saw in the Civil war how hard it was for the southern states to remove themselves from the union and we saw in Brexit how hard it was for Great Britain to remove themselves from the European Union and we see the natural glue that holds nations into the United Nations because if they leave they have no defense against possible sanctions the union may impose on outsiders.

This trend seems to now be pushing for a global new world order that all nations will be forced into eventually.

The PMR points out that no delegate to the Continental Congress was allowed to make amendments or alter anything in the proposed constitution.  Things were fixed before the delegates ever got there. It was Yay, Nay.  Henry and others smelled a rat and if you can find the full text of the PMR you will see there were many questionable shenanigans going on before, during, and after the Constitutional Convention pushing delegates to "take it or leave it".

Our pathetic government schools don't make our kids read the founding documents, much less the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers and much much less the constitutions of the original 13 colonies under the Articles of Confederation.  

Very few people these days have any clue that there were many good constitutions before the federal one.  The US Constitution didn't introduce this idea, it created a UNION.  There are merits to a union of course but ours was to be federated which means that the federal government deals with other nations and the states, NOT the people or counties/cities directly.  It would never have been ratified if this weren't the perception of the people at that time.

Now our federal government is a corporate socialist empire that constantly meddles with the affairs of individual citizens more so than it does with the states creating huge bureaucracies to manage dealing with millions of individuals and businesses and dictating what they can and cannot do from a central hub.  The federal government holds our medical and financial records and monitors our every phone call and email - for national security reasons creating clear vulnerabilities to our privacy and rights.

This all came out of the union.

The good things that are now happening at the state level all over this union are because the states are beginning to realize that this union is way out of line and that push-back is a good thing.  I for one hope we will see some states put in place some checks and balances needed to offset the totalitarian power of our federal government that is now so dysfunctional as to have no resemblance to the original ideas that created it.

BTW Why hasn't Biden even given a state of the Union address yet like every other president in our history has?  And why hasn't our "watch-dog" media even noticed this fact?

Monday, June 15, 2015

Who is KrisAnne Hall?

I got to hear this lady speak today at a local church.  Her topic was a Genealogy of the Constitution.  I was surprised to learn several things I had never heard before despite the fact that I have been a student of history and the constitution for many years.
See here website here.
The documents I had never heard of were:
She held these to be where our constitution and bill of rights came from.  I have argued in several of my posts that the Bill of Rights came from the Pennsylvania Minority Report.but it is quite possible that the minority group got their ideas from these documents.
This woman is such a breath of fresh air!  She fully understands the basis for liberty and the many distinctions needed to not be fooled by the demagogues into a ditch.  She could be Steve Pidgeon's sister!
Her lecture was geared towards the middle-school aged kids and so could not go into great detail but mostly just got the history right.  I know she would love Brent White's Excellence of the Common Law.
I had no time to discuss with her the path we take to get back to liberty.  I didn't know if she was familiar with the many legal problems we have like congress disbanding itself Sainai-Di at the end of the civil war, or the lost 13th amendment, or the distinction between voting and electing.  She knows we live in a de-facto universe I am sure.
She gave me much hope after a lifetime of being unsuccessful at getting many people turned around - even my own family.
Check her out.  I highly support her and her mission!

Friday, January 30, 2015

Understanding Law

Providentially, a friend of mine recently gave me an article he wrote back in 1996 about understanding law.  He asked me if I would type it up for him because he had lost the original electronic version so I did.  I was so impressed that I am pasting it here for posterity's reference.
Understanding Law

Introduction

What I am about to share is intended firstly for Christians, and secondly for any who have grave concerns as to where our country is heading.  It is first to Christians because we should demonstrate the Righteous Standard with our lives (because of His Life In us). Yet we who should be teachers need to be taught.
My own journey which brought me to these things began about 20 years ago.  At that time, the LORD began to impress upon me a conviction.  I had no precedent, no person I was following, almost no support, lots of conflict over it, and only one verse in the Bible to refer to.  It’s often then LORD’S way to call us to obedience without understanding.  It was years later, after many testings and trials over holding to his conviction, that He began to unfold an understanding which included a wealth of Scriptural testimony.
My concern is that Christians in this country today are sorely lacking in two very important areas:
Knowing God’s Law-Psalms 119:1 Blessed are they whose ways are blameless, who walk according to the law of the LORD.
Knowing the power of the Holy Spirit-Ephesians 3:16 I pray that out of His glorious riches He may strengthen you with power through His Spirit in your inner being.
Speaking to the religious leaders of his day, in Matthew 22:29 “Jesus replied, ‘You are in error because you know not the Scriptures nor the power of God’” We suffer from the same problem.
Many today, in trying to figure out the problems and solutions needed in our country, are beginning to relearn some aspects of God’s Law. There is a cursory recognition that our Constitution was largely build on this foundation, that our Creator had a few things to say about civil government and human interactions and right living.  These are subjects every Christian should be well versed in, because they are primary subjects throughout the Scriptures.
Psalms 1:1-2 Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, or stand in the way of sinners or sit in the seat of mockers.  But his delight is in the law of the LORD and on His law he meditates day and night.
Yet in many ways we have adopted pagan law, pagan ways of thought and operation, and often pagan values, and we have known so little of God’s Law that we don’t even realize the difference.  We barely know the elementary teachings of Christ as in Hebrews 5:12 and 6:2, and are not trained and mature to distinguish good from evil.  We are part of the problem.
Understanding Law is one of the most important, most foundational needs in our life.  Not only is it in force and applicable to all areas of life at all times, but it is the necessary context for understanding our need for a Savior.  What do I mean?  Sin is the transgression of the Law. (1 John 3:4)  All have sinned. (Romans 3:23)  Law demands justice, transgressions will be punished. (Jeremiah 17:10 & Galatians 6:7) And the law will always be upheld. (Matthew 5:17-18 & Luke 16:17)  We now have a context within which to see the need for a Savior, and to understand the nature of what He did for us.  Yes, Christ is the answer.  Galatians 3:@4 says the purpose of the law was to lead us to Christ.  (& see Romans 2:18-20) The Law is a framework, the backdrop.  It’s true that God has written these things in our hearts (Romans 2:15), and it’s also true that we each have a God-shaped vacuum in our hearts that only God can fill.  Yet unless we come to the knowledge of truth and respond to it properly, it will count for little in saving and redeeming us.
What’s presented herein are some of those foundational principles of Law as drawn from Scripture.  In Section 6 there is a brief discussion of the power of the Holy Spirit, where it is shown that the only way to fulfill God’s Law unto righteousness is through the life of His Holy Spirit within us, which we receive as a deposit when we repent and come under the blood of Christ (2 Corinthians 1:21-22).

Section 1: Law is and Law is Supreme

Our whole universe is ordered and functions by Law.  From the law of gravity to the law of ‘you reap what you sow’ this is true.  ‘In the beginning God created’ (Genesis 1:1), and “God said ‘Let there be light’“ (v.3), and “day and night” (v.4), and  “seasons and days and years” (v.14).  God established and ordered these things and they are set. We can’t change them.  He has ordered and established all of life, including the laws by which men should live and interact.  Therefore, Law is a science.  It can’t be “enacted” by us, only discovered.  The notion that we shape law and make it what it is is a pagan concept.  The U.S. Supreme Court said in 1993, “There has been no evolution of law since 1973 which says that we should change the decision (of Row v. Wade).” This reflects a transition from a Godly to a pagan base, away from a standard of right and wrong (such as the Ten Commandments) to a socialistic, relativistic, baseless approach.
Galatians 6:7 says “Do not be deceived; God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.” God’s Law is a force.  Choose to ignore the law of gravity by walking off a cliff and see what happens.  It therefore behooves us to discover the rules by which men must live from the One who established them.  We must not be so foolish as to think we can do better.
In about 1620 Samuel Rutherford wrote a book titled “Lex Rex”, meaning Law is King, as opposed to Rex Lex or ‘the King is Law’.  This simply follows Deuteronomy 17:18-20 where God commanded that the king of Israel know the book of the Law and abide by it.  Just because he was the king didn’t mean he could do as he pleased.  God said the king was His servant and must rule justly and according to Law.
James 4:12 There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.
Romans 13:1b,2,4.. for there is no authority except that which God has established.  The authorities that exist have been established by God.  Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.  .. For he is God’s servant to do you good.  But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing.  He is God’s servant, and agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.
Psalms 94:1-2, 7-12 O LORD, the God who avenges,
O God who avenges, shine forth.
Rise up, O judge of the earth;
Pay back to the proud what they deserve.
They say, “The LORD does not see;
The God of Jacob pays no heed.”
Take heed you senseless ones among the people;
You fool, when will you become wise?
Does He who implanted the ear no hear?
Does He who formed the eye not see?
Does He who disciplines nations not punish?
Doe HE who teaches man lack knowledge?
The LORD knows the thoughts of man;
He knows that they are futile.
Blessed is the man you discipline, O LORD
The man you teach from you law.
It is interesting to note the phrase ‘the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God” found in our Declaration of Independence.  In Blackstone’s Commentaries, a work the Founding Fathers were quite familiar with, he says the Law of Nature is the will of his (man’s) Maker, and his binding on all men, and dictated by God Himself.  The Law of Nature refers to the will of God observable in creation, while the Law of Nature’s God refers to the divine law which is revealed throughout the Scripture.  This Law is of course superior to any other.  It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, an all times; no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all the authority mediately or immediately, from this original.
Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-His eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen. Being understood from what has been made, so that men re without excuse.

Section 2 – Authority and Jurisdiction

Authority is a most important principle.  When you have authority to do something, it means you have the right, the legitimate standing to do it.  Jurisdiction is defined as authority or legal power in general or sometimes as the range or sphere of authority.  Ninety percent of the law is jurisdiction.
Authority is of two types: original and delegated.  Original authority comes from being a creator/originator.  If I paint a picture then it is mine to keep, loan, give away, sell, or destroy.  O I can delegate someone to do all these things for me.  Proper delegated authority can only come from a proper source-from one who properly had it.  For example, I cannot delegate anyone authority to murder because I don’t have the right to murder.
Scripture declares that God Almighty is Most High over all the earth.  In Daniel, King Nebuchadnezzar had to learn that “the Most High is sovereign over the kingdoms of men and gives them to anyone he wishes.” (Daniel 4:25, 32, 34-35)  God has original authority/Jurisdiction.  He created the world. He determined its bounds, its order and laws, both spiritual and physical.  Only He has the right to delegate authority on earth to men.
In Matthew 21:23 the Pharisees rightly asked Christ “By what authority do you do these things?” (Also in Luke 20:1-8) They understood authority.  (They just didn’t want to believe his answer.) The centurion understood when he asked Christ to heal his servant.  In Luke 7:6-8 (& Matthew 8:6-10) he said “I have those under my authority and I am under authority myself…”  So Christ need only say the word and the servant would be healed, because he believed Christ had the authority to say so.  When Christ drove the moneychangers from the temple in John 2, they asked him “What miraculous sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?” (He answered “Destroy this temple and I will raise it again in three days.’ V. 18-19).  In Matthew 9:2-7 when the paralytic was lowered through the roof Jesus said “Your sins are forgiven.” then he said, “But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins, get up, take your mat and go home.”  God the Father is Most High, and His Son Jesus Christ declared in Matthew 28:18 that “All authority in heaven and earth has been given to me. (by the Father).”
Authority (exousia in the Greek) is not to be confused with power (dynamis in the Greek).  Power refers to might or strength, not right or legitimacy.  Christ was given both power and authority over all the earth.
Ephesians 1:20-21 … which he exerted in Christ when he raised him from the dead and seated him at the right hand in the heavenly realms, for above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every title that can be given, not only in the present age but also in the age to come. (also see Colossians 2:10)
Christ gave his disciples authority to cast out demons in his Name. “He called his twelve disciples to him and gave them authority to drive out evil spirits and to heal every disease and sickness.” (Matthew 10:11) The demons were still more powerful than the disciples were as men, but he the delegated authority Christ gave them was from a proper source, and the demons had to obey—Christ’s power was behind it.
Jurisdiction also carries with it the concept of limits and bounds, particularly delegated authority.  If it is outside your jurisdiction then you have no proper authority over it.  Since God has original jurisdiction over all the earth, then the only proper delegated authorities are those which God has ordained.  Romans 13:1says “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.  The authorities that exist have been established by God.”  Any other claim to authority is only usurped or self-appointed, and should be resisted/rejected as improper, unlawful, invalid, i.e. not of God (more on this in Section 5).  In fact, God specifically commanded the Israelites not to obey pagan law.
Leviticus 18:1-5 The LORD said to Moses, ‘Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘I am the LORD your God.  You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you.  Do not follow their practices.  You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees.  I am the LORD you God. Keep my decrees and laws, for the man who obeys them will live by them.  I am the LORD.
Notice too in Romans 13 that the word ‘authorities’ is plural.  God ordained several authorities on earth not only civil government.  Each has its jurisdictional sphere, its limits and bounds.  To name a few; He ordained the conscience within man, the family with parents over children and husband over wife, the elders in the church, and the civil government to punish wrongdoers (criminals) within a nation.  Each sphere has its assigned duties and responsibilities for which there is accountability.
Hebrews 13:17 Obey your leaders and submit to their authority.  They keep watch over you as men who must give account.
As with any other sin, this applies to doing what you should and not doing what you shouldn’t.  This jurisdictional model necessitates that you stay within your delegated sphere.  To overstep these limits is to be in a position of not having proper authority, to be out of God’s established order, to be violating God’s Law.  For example, I have the responsibility and duty to train up my children, but not my neighbor’s children.  I have no right to force a man to violate his conscience before God, and I have no authority personally to punish a criminal.  Likewise, the civil government has no authority to command me how to raise my children, or to regulate the teachings and functions of the church and its elders. (How to respond when a victim of such transgressions will be discussed in Sections 5-7)

Section 3 – Contracts

The third foundation of Law lies in understanding the difference between natural law and contract law.  True Law is universal.  It applies to everyone at all times.  Also it requires little in the way of actions from us (don’t steal, don’t kill, etc.).  You are free to act tithing this framework, and free to enter any agreements you may so choose.  Upon doing so, you are now bound by the terms of the agreement.
Galatians 3:15 Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life.  Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case.
You are now under contract law.  The Law requires us to speak truthfully, to not bear false witness. (Commandment 9) God frowns heavily on unfulfilled vows.
Ecclesiastes 5:4-6  When you make a vow to God, do not delay in fulfilling it.  He has no pleasure in fools: fulfill your wow.  It is better not to vow than to make a vow and not fulfill it.  Do not let your mouth lead you into sin.  And do not protest to the temple messenger, “My vow was a mistake” Why should God be angry at what you san and destroy the work of your hands?
This difference between natural and contract law is reflected in our legal system by the courts of law and courts of equity.  It is seen in salvation, in that Christ’s blood brings us under a new covenant/contract with God.
Hebrews 9:15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance-now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.
Under the Law all men are sinners going to judgment.
Romans 3:23 ..for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.
Hebrews 9:27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment.
The old covenant made a covering for sins through the blood of animals, but the new covenant made a better way, and through Christ’s blood paid the just requirements of the Law.
Hebrews 9:12-14 He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves: but he entered the Most Holy place once for all by his own blood, having obtained eternal redemption.  The blood of goats and bulls and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean.  How much more, then, will the blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleans you consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!
The terms of this covenant are laid out in Jeremiah 31:31-34, 7:23, and Hebrews 8:8-12.
The terms a valid contract can never violate natural law, and they deal with things you have no requirement at natural law to perform, but once you agree to the contract, it becomes law for you.  Any legitimate contract must be entered freely and knowingly - Coercion or fraud are grounds for nullifying a contract.
The Constitution for the U.S. was a contract, as was the Mayflower Compact.  In fact, our founding fathers weren’t rebellious.  They simply declare that King George had so often and in so many ways violated the contracts (Charters, Compacts) by which they came to America, that they wer no longer valid and thus rightfully and lawfully nullified.  Rebellion would have been wrong, but to hold themselves and each other, including the king, accountable to their word/agreements shows respect to the law and honor to God.

Section 4 – Justice

Another foundation of God’s Law is the principle of Justice.  Simply put, it is that you reap what you sow.
Isaiah 3:10-11 Tell the righteous it will be well with them, for they will enjoy the fruit of their deeds.  Woe to the wicked!  Disaster is upon them! They will be paid back for what their hands have done.
Galatians 6:7 Do not be deceived; God cannot be mocked.  A man reaps what he sows.
This is an all-inclusive law of the universe, a law of cause and effect.  It is true in the physical world, in morality, in society, in relationships, etc.  All of life has its laws, its order is established by a Creator.  Justice is the application of the deserved rewards and punishments of obeying or breaking those laws/order.  By definition, then, there is required a defined standard of right and wrong.  This is I not a world of no absolutes, of relativism, of merely differing opinions of right and wrong.  Nor where the State decides right and wrong, and can change its mind (evolve).  James 4:12 states there is one Lawmaker and Judge.  Accountability is a reality.  Because justice reigns, you will reap what you sow.  So remember, you can choose to ignore the Law, but you cannot choose to ignore the effects of ignoring the Law.
Jesus made a very profound statement when criticizing the Pharisees for their hypocrisy, He said they had ignored the “weightier matters of the law”. What are these weightier matters? --- Justice, Mercy, Faithfulness.
Matthew 23:23 Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites!  You give a tenth of your spices-mint, dill, and cumin.  But you have neglected the more important matters of the law- justice, mercy, and faithfulness.  You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former.
This is almost a direct quote of Micah 6:8, which reads:
He has shown you, O man, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you?  To act justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
Justice is a very high and important matter to the Most High.
Isaiah 61:8 For I the LORD, love justice.  I hate robbery and iniquity.
Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good; maintain justice in the courts.  Perhaps the LORD God Almighty will have mercy.
Psalms 11:5&7 The LORD examines the righteous, but the wicked and those who love violence his soul hates.  For the LORD is righteous, he loves justice; upright men will see his face.
Justice is necessary to the Law of Love; to treat anyone unjustly is not love.
James 2:8-9, 12-12 IF you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” you are doing right.  But if you show favoritism, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers… Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by the law that gives freedom (i.e. Royal Law), because judgment without mercy will be shown to anyone who has not been merciful.

Section 5 – Submit vs Resist

A corollary to the “reap what you sow” principle is to understand Scripture’s admonition to submit and to resist.  This is the simple application of knowing what to sow and what not to sow.  Scripture commands both-submit and resist-and defines when to do which.
Proverbs 28:4 Those who forsake the law praise the wicked, but those who keep the law resist them.
Many references call us to submit (to one another, to husband, to masters, etc.).  Likewise, Paul said in referring to false brothers in Galatians 2:5, “..but we did not submit to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might remain with you.”  James 4:7 says to “Submit yourselves, then, to God.  Resist the devil.”  That is a good theme verse of the Bible. Realizing to o that Go’s nature and methods are opposite those of Satan’s , we also see that whatever is not of God’s nature and order was resist.
Philippians 4:8 Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable-if anything is excellent or praiseworthy-think about such things.
Galatians 5:16, 18-23  So I say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the sinful nature… But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law. The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery, idolatry and witchcraft, hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, self ambition, dissensions, factions and envy, drunkenness, orgies, and the like.  I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.  But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self control.  Against such things there is no law.
I want to clearly state that the use of the term ‘resist’ as in these verse is not speaking of aggression or attacking.  To resist is not to destroy in an offensive sense.  Rather to resist is to refuse to cooperate, to not participate, not give you assent, not allow entrance (into your life).  To resist the devil or sinful nature means you will have nothing to do with it.  It is not a passive response, for the way to resist is to actively choose the alternative, to submit to God.
Many references command us to hate evil.
Romans 12:9 Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.
Amos 5:14-15 Seek good, not evil, that you may live.  Then the LORD God Almighty will be with you just as you say he is.  Hate evil, love good; maintain justice in the courts.
Proverbs 8:13 To fear the LORD is to hate evil; I hate pride and arrogance, evil behavior and perverse speech.
Ephesians 5:11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness but rather expose them.
In truth, we give strength to any lie/evil whenever we acquiesce, accept, comply, cooperate—in short, when we fail to resist it.  We don’t have to actively choose, support, or defend it.  To simply not stand against tit strengthens it, and brings us into disobedience to God for not resisting.  Edmond Burke said, “All that’s required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”.
There are a few other points about submit/resist that should also be noted.  Submit is not identical to obey.  It is possible to submit and disobey at the same time.  David recognized and submitted to Saul as King over Israel, yet he sidestepped Saul’s spear, and evaded capture time and again.  Christ submitted unto death on the cross, though He did not obey everything Herod or the Sanhedrin said.  He obeyed God always.  An excellent definition of submit is in 1 Peter 2:19-23
For it is commendable if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God.  But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable before God. To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.  “He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.” When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats.  Instead, he entrusted himself to him how judges justly.
Also, resist is not to rebel.  Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft.  1 Samuel 15:23a “For rebellion is like the sin of divination, and arrogance like the evil of idolatry.”  Rebellion against any of God’s ordained order/authority is sin.  However, to fail to resist sin, evil, wickedness, etc. is also sin.  Even when it emanates from a God ordained ‘position’.
Which brings up a third differentiation—to resist should be only against the errant part.  Jurisdiction can be in at least three different spheres: geographical, person, or subject matter.  In Acts 4, Peter and John stand before the Sanhedrin.  They don’t argue against their geographical jurisdiction as elders over Israel or jurisdiction over their person as Israelites, only against their subject matter jurisdiction.  That is, they had no proper authority to command Peter and John to not speak or teach in the Name of Jesus.  Therefore Peter and John would resist that command and obey God instead.

Whenever someone oversteps the bounds of their proper delegated authority, we don’t thereafter deny them any recognition.  We continue to respect their proper authority, only resisting the errant part.  Likewise, a position of authority may be valid, but the person in it may be a scoundrel.  We still show respect for the position even if we must resist the improper actions of the scoundrel (David and Saul)
Another important concept to understand is the difference between an interest, a right, and a sacred trust.  In Law, a right always supersedes an interest and a sacred trust always supersedes a right.  My neighbor (or the State) may have an interest in my property, and a compelling interest in my children (their education, for example).  I can sell or grant them my property if I want to—it’s mine and I have the right.  But they have no right to take it from me just because they want (covet) it.  However, my children aren’t ‘mine’, but God has ‘entrusted’ them to my care for a time, and commanded me to train them up.  Therefore I cannot give my children over to my neighbor/State no matter how compelling their interest might be. (Leviticus 20:1-5,7) And their compelling interest gives them no right to command me how to train my children.
With this quick review of some of the most basic principles of Law, let’s now examine a few applications.

Section 6 – Spiritual Applications

God’s Law and order rules in the spirit world just as it does in the physical world.  This is easily seen by examining the enemy, Satan.  If there was a way around God’s sovereignty, he’s be the one to know.  Yet Satan himself recognized the supremacy of God and His Law.  Did he not come ask permission in order to touch Job (Job 1:6-12 & 2:1-6)?  And he asked permission to sift Peter (Luke 22:31).
Satan also recognizes delegated as well as original authority.  For when Christ was on earth, the demons cried out who he was, until Christ commanded them to be silent (which they did).
Mark 1:27 The people were all so amazed that they asked each other, “What is this?”  a new teaching- and  with authority!  He even gives order to evil spirits and they obey him”.
When Christ said, “Get the behind me, Satan.” (Mark 8:33) did we hear any backtalk?  The demons submitted to the disciples after Christ had given them authority to cast them out in His Name (Matthew 10:1) Yet the demons also knew ‘pretended’ authority.
Acts 19:13-16 Some Jews who went around driving out evil spirits tried to invoke the name of the Lord Jesus over those who were demon possessed.  They would say, “In the name of Jesus whom Paul preaches, I command you to come out.” Severn sons of Sceva, a Jewish chief priest, were doing this.  One day the evil spirit answered them, ‘Jesus I know, and Paul I know, but who are you?”  Then the man who had the evil spirit jumped on them and over powered them all.  He gave them such a beating that they ran out of the house naked and bleeding.
Satan also made an interesting claim when tempting Jesus.
Luke 4:5-7 The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world.  And he said to him, “I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to.  So if you worship me, it will all be yours.”
This is true—mostly.  (He forgot to mention that one day these ‘worldly kingdoms’ will all perish, and he will end up with only the lake of fire.)  Satan has his own jurisdiction or kingdom.  He is prince of the power of the air (Ephesians 2:2).  His realm covers all sin.  He was a murderer from the beginning and the father of all lies (John 8:44).   John 1:34 tells us “Everyone who sins is a slave to sin.”  Therefore, whenever we sin, we enter Satan’s jurisdiction and he now has authority over us in that area.  We have left the protective jurisdiction of God and are now subject to His just judgment.   It will come at its appointed time; Stan knows that his time is short (Revelation 12:12).  If we never sinned, Satan could not touch us without God’s permission.  But every time we sin we give Satan more ground/authority in our life. (A true believer will confess and repent daily and allow him no such ground.)
Romans 3:19-20 New we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God.  Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin.
There is a remedy for this.  While the Law teaches us we deserve death, it also leads us to Christ.
Galatians 3:21-14 Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not!  For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.  But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe,   Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed.  So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.
Christ said he didn’t come to do away with the law, but to fulfill it (Matthew 5:17-20).  And so he did.  He paid the just penalty for our sins through shedding his blood, to satisfy justice.
Romans 3:21-26 But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the law and the Prophets testify.  This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.  There is no difference for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Jesus Christ.  God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement through faith in his blood.  He did this to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.
Romans 3:31 Do we, then, nullify the law by this faith?  Not at all!! Rather, we uphold the law.
Remember, a contract is not law, but when entered it becomes law for the agreeing parties.  Through Christ we are now in a contract/covenant (or promise, as in Galatians 3:21 above) situation with God, i.e. the new covenant by the blood of Christ and by faith.  Under this covenant, He puts His Spirit within us (2 Corinthians 1:21-22 & 5:5), and writes His law on our hearts and minds (Hebrews 8:10-11 & 10:16).
We will now fulfill God’s Law, not by the supervision of the law/written code and human effort (Galatians 3:3, 25), but by faith and by the power of the Holy Spirit within us (Galatians 5:18; Ephesians 3:16; 2 Corinthians 3:5; & Romans 2:29).
Romans 8:2-4 Because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from the law of sin and death.  For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the sinful nature, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful man to be a sin offering.  And so he condemned sin in sinful man, in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the sinful nature, but according to the Spirit.
So then, we are in a battle of two laws, two jurisdictions, two paths.  God has provided a remedy out of Satan’s jurisdiction (realm of sin) for all who will choose it, through confession, repentance, accepting the finished work of Christ’s blood, and living then by the new covenant under his blood in the power and leading of his Spirit.
Now let’s recall the submit/resist principle.  Satan hates to lose people from his side and is continually roaming looking for an opportunity to tempt and devour.  It becomes an everyday and all time thing for us to examine all that comes our way, and discern whether it is of God or not, and then submit or resist accordingly.  It is imperative that we continue to study and learn of God and His Law (with the help of the Holy Spirit’s enlightening) so that we will recognize the source and nature of things.  The enemy’s fiery darts can take endlessly deceiving forms from fleshly lusts, pride of life, our good works done only in the flesh, voices without, putting thoughts in our head, even supernatural experiences where Satan comes as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14-15).  If we slip at some point though, all is not lost.  Colossians 2:6 tells us that “as you received Christ, so live in him.” - i.e. confess, repent, be cleansed by his blood.
1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.
So if the Holy Spirit convicts you of something in your life, then submit to him and resist the temptation to procrastinate, or justify yourself, and thereby grieve the Holy Spirit.

Section 7 – Civil Government Applications

In dealing with the subject of civil government, let me first point out that every Scriptural reference to submitting to governing authorities also specifically commands that we “do right” (Hebrews 13:2 & 1 Peter 2:15).  And this means ‘right’ in God’s eyes.
1 Timothy 1:8-11 We know that the law is good if one uses it properly.  We also know that law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers and mothers, for murderers, for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers - and for whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God.
God ordained civil government and defined their duties and demanded that they operate according to His Law and Justice.  When they don’t, we still obey God by doing what He says is right – even if we suffer for it.
1 Peter 2: 16-17 Live as free men, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as servants of God.  Show proper respect for everyone; love the brotherhood of believers, fear God, honor the king.
….3:13-15  Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good?  But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed.  Do not fear what they fear, do not be frightened.  But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord.
…4:15-16, 19  If you suffer it should not be as a murderer or a thief or any kind of criminal, or even as a meddler.  However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name.  So then, those who suffer according to God’s will should commit themselves to their faithful Creator and continue to do good.
If you suffer for doing good and endure it, this is ‘commendable before God’ (1 Peter 2:19-20)
John the Baptist was imprisoned and then beheaded for telling Herod it was unlawful for him to have his brother’s wife (Mark 5:18).  Whose law do you think John was referring to?  Roman law?  In Roman law Caesar was god.  It was no problem to declare divorce and remarriage ‘legal’.
Remember also that civil government’s jurisdiction has limits.  Whenever they try to command/enforce things God never delegated them authority to do (such as meddle in a parent’s training of their children), they are outside their ordained authority and must be resisted.  Many times in Scripture rulers are kept in check because they feared the people (Matthew 21:26, 46; 14:5-9; 26:5 for a few).  Whenever the people of any nation/government refuse to do wrong and steadfastly do right, even in the face of force and punishment, government is weakened and held accountable for being out of line.  But whenever people obey like sheep whatever they are told, and not follow their conscience before God, evil flourishes, because there is no resistance.  And words count for little without actions.
It’s interesting to study when Jesus was before Pilate.  Here is a question: Did Pilate sin in putting Jesus to death on the cross?  He tried to wash his hands of the guilt, yet he was the one with the authority to decide life or death.  The Pharisees came to Pilate because they wanted the death penalty, and that was outside their authority (John 18:31).  In John 19:10 Pilate said to Jesus, “Don’t you realize I have power to free you or crucify you?”  Jesus answered, “You would have no power over me if it were not given you from above.” (v.11)  Does that mean Pilate had the authority and could do it without sin?  Did Jesus submit to death because Pilate’s authority is valid?  No.  Jesus submitted to death because he was being obedient to God the Father.  In John 10:18 Jesus said “No one takes my life from me, but I lay it down of my own accord.  I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again.  This command I received from my Father.”  There were other times when they sought to arrest him but Jesus hid himself because His time had not yet come.  In fact, Jesus refused to obey and Pilate, Herod, and the Sanhedrin a number of times while never denying they had some legitimate authority.  (Matthew 26:62-63 & 27:12=14; Mark 14:60-61 & 15:3-5; Luke 23:9; John 18:19-24 & 19:8-10)  Yes, Pilate did sin in crucifying Jesus.  In John 19:11 Jesus said “…the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin.” But what was Pilate’s sin?  Injustice—he condemned an innocent man.  And he knew he was innocent (Matthew 27:19, 23-24), but he did so to please the people (Mark 15:15).
Isaiah 10:1-3 Woe to those who make unjust laws, and to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.  What will you do on the day of reckoning… (before God)?
But now let’s look at a present day situation in our own land—abortion.  The sixth Commandment says “Thou shalt not murder.” That the government and courts sanction it does not make abortion right. Many acknowledge this, but say, “the government hasn’t commanded me to abort, so there is nothing to resist yet.”  But evil is seldom so up front in its entrance.  It finds a thousand ways to confuse us and compromise us so that the distinction is muddled and the line you draw is always “not here yet”.  For example, if you try to help save a baby from being aborted, they won’t arrest you for resisting aborting.  They may arrest you for trespassing, disturbing the peace, blocking traffic, harassing, obstruction of justice (sic), congregating without a permit, or violating some other zoning regulation or city ordinance.  You can preach against abortion all you want – just do so in your licensed churches (where you can be regulated if you become a real threat to public policy).  Neither Caesar, Hitler, nor Communist Russia ever made a law against preaching Jesus, as long as you were in a licensed church (5001c3).  Of course they may have wanted to approve the sermons at times.
I choose to look at abortion because, in America, so many of the deceptions used to draw us away from our Godly foundations are reflected here.  We have a government by contract.  Our founding fathers gave us a system whereby we could be responsible and free.  The Preamble to the Constitution says “… and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution…” But, like Esau, we have treated our birthright as of little worth (Genesis 25:29-34).  We have chosen back into serfdom, mostly through contracts, handouts, and accepting pretended authority.  Therefore, in Roe v. Wade the Court ruled the only way it could.  Why?  Because Roe was a federal citizen/subject/serf, not a free American under the Republic.  Why do I say this?  What do I mean?
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution reads “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside”.
Note:
1.       Obviously the U.S. citizenship is federal, as it is in addition to any possible State Citizenship.
2.       This citizenship is a subject/serf type because it is created and granted by the federal U.S., and whatever they create they have the power (original authority) to regulate or even destroy.  Contrarily, a Preamble Citizen declared their rights to be unalienable, from God.  These people created the federal government, by contract, and retain the right to regulate, even abolish, the government, not vise versa;
3.       How do you again this type of federal citizenship?  You are either born, naturalized, and/or subject to their jurisdiction.  This third one begin the way most people are deceived into it.  That is, whenever one receives federal welfare, or enters a contract with them for some benefit (social security), they become subject to their jurisdiction.  Row was on welfare, had a Social Security number, and was in such respects under their jurisdiction, and therefore was treated by the Court as a federal citizen.  So what did the 14th Amendment say?
4.       “All persons born…”  An unborn child had no standing before the Court that it could be protected.
But what does the Preamble say?  “… for our Posterity…”  And when does posterity begin?  Arguably it si in the loins of man, but certainly posterity exists and is recognized by the law at conception.  They (the founding fathers) certainly were securing the blessings of liberty for descendents as yet unborn.  Had the case before the Court been in this context, the Court would have had to rule differently.
This is the manner by which we have been deceived and misled into pagan law.  We did not understand the principles of True Law well enough to see what was happening to us.  We have accepted pretended authority.  Most of what the federal government does today is done through the loopholes:  Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the Constitution, coupled with the 14th Amendment; through Treaties (which become ‘law of the land’); through Executive Orders and declared State of Emergency (suspends the Constitution); and/or through contracts and handouts with the people and States.  And we have sat by while they have found ways to ‘make legal’ things which would never be lawful before God or our Constitution.  And we haven’t resisted, we haven’t refused to participate.  They have been out of line and we haven’t held them accountable.
Social Security is another example.  It is the area in which I had a conviction from God almost 20 years ago.  It is against God’s order (I Timothy 5:8).  It undermines the family.  It was never an ordained function of government.  The Constitution gave the government no authority for such a program (except in D.C.-article 1, section 8 clause 17).  And contrary to what most Americans have been misled to believe, there is not law requiring anyone to get an SSN.  Therefore, if you get one, you must have volunteered into this contract (take-my-money-take-care-of-me-later) with government.  The contract now becomes binding and enforceable in court.  The Feds gain great power through this accept-our-money-accept-our-regulation type approach.  Too often people have chosen the handout rather than be responsible and free, with faith in God.  Why not simply opt out, stop volunteering, and trust God instead?

Section 8 – Major Principles to Apply

We must begin to study and know God’s Law, that we would know how to live rightly, and that we can avoid deceptions.
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline.
We must start with the first and greatest commandment, to love the LORD your God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength (Deuteronomy 6:5).
Matthew 22:37-40 Jesus replied: ‘Love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’  this is the first and greatest commandment.  And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.
Galatians 5:14 The entire law is summed up in a single command: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’
Jesus said that if we love Him we will obey Him and listen to Him (John 14:15 & 10:1-3) And He promised to give us a Counselor to help us and to be with us forever (John 14:16)
We need to seek Him and study Scripture to learn God’s order and character.  Examine everything that comes our way (like as in testing the spirits in 1 John 4:!), to see what source it is from, if it is proper or not.  Ask ‘by what authority?’  Always be ready to submit if it’s proper and resist if it’s not.  Seek the LORD’s direction and walk in obedience to Him.

Resist through non-compliance and non-cooperation.  You don’t need to fight or attack anyone.  Simply don’t assent or acquiesce to evil.  If something is not right and of God, resist the pressures that try to force you to do it anyway.  Satan’s methodology is to manipulate, force, intimidate, cause fear, etc.  Begin to cancel and revoke all ungodly contracts and entanglements-written, verbal, even spiritual.  Abjure is the term at law.  It means to repent: i.e. Yes I did it; It was wrong; I repent; and I won’t do it again.

Monday, October 20, 2014

The pin/chip EBT scam - corruption beyond repair

Obama's recent executive order to have your tax dollars pay for Citi-Bank's upgrade of their credit-card system is almost as bad as TARP yet was not covered by mainstream media in the least.

I just learned about this atrocity from the No Agenda Show.  You can hear the appropriate part by downloading the show and going to the 1:20:36 time-point. (till 1:32:46 = 12 minutes 10 seconds long)
In summary here's what happened:
Obama just signed an executive order to have the US Treasury make a plan to upgrade our EBT credit card system to use chips as is now used in Europe. (cost - way more than the annual cost of credit card fraud).  What this order does is:

  • Update all government EBT credit card terminals to use the upgraded system.
  • Replace EBT procedures to use the newer cards
  • Transfer cracked credentials to the government
  • Create the Buy Secure initiative.
  • Ensure federal investigators can report stolen credentials with other companies (Home Depot, Walmart etc.)
  • Support credit score transparency via Citi Bank credit cards
Ok so here is what this means:

The Government, who decided to utilize a credit card system to support their welfare EBT funds disbursement, is now footing the bill to upgrade this insecure system on behalf of the private company (Citi Bank) that owns the newer technology and at the same time is giving itself and other companies access to YOUR CREDIT CARD CREDENTIALS (passwords/pins).  
Normally, when a company creates a system that is BROKEN (as our current credit card system is - proven by all the identity theft going on) it is liable for its mistakes and must foot the bill both for the cost of its mistakes and for its correction.  This is the natural free-enterprise way that goods and service quality is maintained - do it right, or go out of business and let the competition do it right.
So what this accomplishes is it:

  • Removes responsibility for identity theft from the private corporations that made it so easy to do.
  • Pays for the fix by the most inefficient means (government funding).
  • Charges the taxpayer for this.
  • Breaches security further by sharing credentials with the government and other corporations.
  • Adds more regulations and forces you to adhere to new security standards enforced by law. 
What is more, this is being done by Executive Order which is inherently unconstitutional and was created by Lincoln in time of war for an emergency.
What is more is that the media covered Obama's jokes but nothing about what he was signing.

Send a link of this article to your congressman and urge him to not only rescind this executive order (Congress only has 30 days to do so or it becomes law) and in fact to rescind the whole Executive Order process.  This president is dismantling our freedoms and security with it daily and is charging you for it.

The more power you give government, the more special interests can use that power to their advantage.

Unbelievable.  What a rip off!


Tuesday, January 1, 2013

A Thought for the New Year

Historically, governments have been the greatest abusers of individual rights and property.  Does it not make sense that the entity that needs gun control is then the government?
Our founding fathers wisely set this up in the constitution by prohibiting a standing army in times of peace.  It is the only case I know of in history where a government was given limits on how many guns it could have.
Our own government has demonstrated its ability to use WMD at the conclusion of WWII.  They deemed it necessary to bomb Japan twice publicly to "keep the peace".
So how does it make sense to pursue the transfer of military power to a central world government has has been US policy since 1961?  Is this the policy of the people over our leaders or did such a policy come from another quarter?
Note the increasing number of public mass shootings being reported by the media.  These do not seem to take place in places where guns are commonly held (Israel, police departments, military bases, or communities that commonly carry firearms).  In fact these events mostly happen at disarmed locations (theatres, public schools, etc.)  I am actually very surprised one hasn't yet happend at a TSA weapons inspection site yet.
All common sense logic, human nature, and history to me seem to point to limiting the arms of the government and allowing individuals the power to defend themselves as the best course to peace and tranquility.
If one were to simply watch an action movie from the 1980s (I recerntly saw the Blues Brothers for example) you will see how pathetically armed the police of that day were compared to today.  There has been a trend in weapons management over the past several decades that seems to coincide with the quantity of mass shootings.  Arming the police or government at any level does not seem to promote tranquility to me.
Why this thought seems to not be carried along in the public square to me is evidence of attempts to direct the thinking of the minds of Americans to support interests of those who wish to use government to violate individual and property rights to their benefit.l l Many Americans are seeing this as gun sales would indicate.
Can we turn things back to a more peaceful past?  I hope so.

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Another great Steve Pidgeon Speech

My friend Steve Pidgeon has once again articulated with great clarity many key ideas that concern anyone who loves liberty.  Check it out here.

Concepts he addresses:
  • The true source of rights
  • What was the difference between the first and second Washington State Constitutions
  • The true source of all human law
  • The lawfulness of the United States of America
  • The superior jurisdiction over property
  • And many more...
Enjoy!  I sure did!

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Principles In Liberty 38 - a visit with Jay Inslee

Jay Inslee



Download

Summary:
Recorded on 5-10-2009
00:15 Intro
01:00 Jay sets the stage
01:38 My comments - The setup: socialist methodology right off the bat
02:16 Where does the federal govt. get jurisdiction over healthcare from the constitution?
02:50 Veterans picked first to hide behind
03:05 Healthcare question from the audience - will you do whatever Obama says? Audience cheers and boos
05:15 My comments: the maturity of the audience lets Jay play them like a pro.
06:00 Jays response - we will disagree, please don't boo
07:10 I don't rubber stamp anything
07:19 My comments - How many bills have you voted for without having read them besides the patriot act and the stimulus package? That is a rubber stamp.
08:18 Jay is not interested in our opinions - he didn't want my written questions. He is putting on a show.
09:20 Jay: "I represent the people I represent"
09:51 You want choice preserved - we will do that. You can keep what you have now.
10:56 We would make changes to the existing private insurance - no longer be able to deny coverage to certain persons.
12:05 My comments - This is interference in the right to privately contract - and is unconstitutional and socalist in nature.
13:44 The inability for insurance companies to discriminate forces them to become expensive and they will not be able to compete with the government system.
14:30 This is not fair competition - the government has taxes to back itself up while insurance companies don't.
15:35 Jay: 3rd: We subsidize the premiums of the poor.
16:06 Sandy: Subsidies are not free - them come from the people - this is theft.
17:10 Jay: Proposal of how to pay for subsidy: a) Efficiencies in the scale and technology of the system, b) More preventative health c) additional taxes on the rich. (over $250k/year)
18:43 Sandy: You are admitting you are a socialist and you don't care about the law.
19:12 Sandy: Look at how the income tax was sold as a tax on the rich.
20:11 Jay: The devil is in the details. There will be a big debate during the discussion. Obama want's every american to get the same coverage the congressmen get.
21:35 Sandy: This is backwards. Congressmen should get the same coverage as their constituents not the other way around.
22:23 Audience memger: What about single payer insurance?
"Single payer health insurance is a system by which the health care expenditures of an entire population are paid for through one source the Federal government or a subcontracting entity using tax revenue from individuals and employers."
23:50 Jay: We tried to get single payer system with Clinton but it failed to pass. It's a bridge too far. We need to go incrementally.
24:11 Sandy: Single payer coverage will destroy all private medical systems because there will be no way to compete with tax funded government services.
26:12 Progressive Caucus Audience member: Why have you not yet signed on to HR 676?
27:00 Jay: Not likely passable. If I could write poetry the bills would be different. My job is to make progress where it can be achieved.
27:44 Jay: Example: Cash for Clunkers bill. Comprimised on the voucher requirements and got it passed - beats doing nothing.
28:26 Jay: People are desperate for healthcare right now. Real people need healthcare now.
29:32 Sandy: Healthcare costs have gone up as government interference has increased. Healthcare is not static. It is bursting to break into a new paradigm but it can't do this under the present limitations imposed by the government and drug company interests.
32:14 Sandy: How can a centralized system encourage preventative medicine without controling the actions of everyone - telling each of us what to eat and when to exercies. Its total slavery.
33:11 Audience follow up Q: HR 1826 - Take corporations out of elections so we are properly represented.
33:40 Jay: Nobody tells your congressman how to vote. I support public campaign financing since 1994.
34:15 Sandy: Here's my suggestion for campaign reform: Make the districts smaller and have a larger house of representatives.
37:11 Ken Burra says the military does take care of its workers.
38:00 Jay: we have not been funding the VA adequately and is an embarrasment and has improved.
38:30 Sandy: When government funds healthcare there is no limit to its cost. Costs rise the more $ you throw at the problem.
39:30 Sandy: VA situation - We shouldn't have professional soldiers and standing armies. We have tons of problems that have risen from these policies.
40:00 Sandy: I support opposing the war but congress should have declared war instead of just allowing military use but no declaration of war.
41:00 Audience: Would you agree that we had good healthcare in the 60s? What about the HMO act of 1972? Didn't this cause the bills to go high?
42:00 Audience: How did the HMO act cause this change in medical care costs:
42:20 Jay: I don't understand what you are saying.
42:51 Jay's stab at an answer: "Not all HMOs are created evil." Better decisions about procedures will help. More preventative care. Need more evidence based medicine to improve decisions. We need better standards.
44:24 Sandy: This guys point is probably right. He is trying to solve the cause not slap on another solution.
44:45 Sandy: The techniquie of growing government: create a problem and offer your solution.
45:30 Sandy: Medicine is ready to explode in quality and efficiency if we can just be free.
46:13 Sandy: I have a Dr. that can do better and cheaper tests than an MRI but those methods are not accepted as "standard". The status quo doesn't want a paradigm shift.
47:00 Sandy: These experiments should be done at the state level.
47:30 Audience: Why do we have to have a job to have health insurance.
49:00 Jay: Single payer option - I want people to have a choice to use a government medical plan like medicare. The insurance companies don't want this because it will cost less and they will lose customers.
50:39 Sandy: Choice - to go outside the constitution. Government as a service is the begining of the end. Europe has this - a nice comfey box. People have different ideas and desires. Taxes for this purpose is theft as outlined in the communist manifesto. All you do when you steal is create pain and destroy wealth - it never solves problems. I am sorry for this guy stuck in the trap set by government.
53:43 Sandy: Ex: Microsoft health insurance for me cost the company $15k/year. I had no option to decline that coverage and take the cash because the HMO agreement is made in the whole. Individuals do not have the option to take or leave the coverage. If I denied myself the coverage it would still cost Microsoft $15k/year for me.
55:13 Jay: Budget and tax issues
56:00 Audience: Water flouridation - its bad for our health - I have 200 pages of documentation for you. I don't understand why we continue to flouridate the water.
57:00 Jay: My understanding is that it is a health benefit but I am open to new information. Lets take a budget or tax question.
57:20 Sandy: This audience member is missing the real point - the constitution does not grant the federal government the right to flouridate our water.
58:00 Audience: Sin tax suggestion: Lets tax cigarettes more. A use tax is more fair to fund these healthcare programs.
59:00 Jay: I support the idea.
59:30 Jay: We just passed a bill after 15 years of work, to allow the FDA to monitor and regulate tomacco.
59:50 Jay: Your idea may be good but you get to a level where increasing the taxes decreases revenues - but maybe thats good.
01:00:17 Audience: I'm concerned about the ecconomic situation - recless spending is going to have to be paid by future generations.
01:00:56 Jay: We are very much behind the eight ball on this. We do know we have to change the long-term fiscal condition of the country.
01:01:26 Jay: I voted for the stimulus bill that was not paid for. I thought it was the right decision due to the crisis at the moment. Had we not given the ecconomy a boost we might have seen what happened in the 30s.
01:02:30 Short term: I look forward to when we are not suporting the Iraq War. We have been paying for the war with borrowed money. "I always thought that was wrong frankly."
01:02:51 Jay: I voted against the original Iraq war. I thought if we were to fight this war, all of us should be engaged in it.
01:03:19 Sandy: What war? No war was declared. But thanks Jay for voting against it!
01:03:47 Jay: A huge part of the federal budget is healthcare. The rate of medical inflation has to be brought down. That is where the budget cancer is. Comparing the demographics we see even bigger problems here.
01:05:47 Jay: If you want to solve the deficit problem it will involve pain.
01:06:17 Audience: NAFTA - We've watched our jobs leave this country - shouldn't we take another look at this? Think about how much $ we have lost due to NAFTA. Lets go back and relook at NAFTA.
01:08:00 Jay: Obama addressed the truck issue. He has not said he wants to address NAFTA.
01:08:36 Jay: How about global warming - something fair to our manufacturers. Lets move on to other people now.
01:13:58 Bob Horn: Finincal Justice in America. The bank bailouts have left us with a financial oligarchy in place with no check on the bankers. (Loud Applause)
01:15:05 Jay: "So I guess there's not many oligarch's in the audience" (Laughter) Halalula to what you're saying. I voted against the original bailout bill. But there wasn't any real criteria on who would get the $ or any transparency. We don't even know where the money has gone.
01:15:15 Sandy: You voted against it but you cosponsored it . You JERK!!!
01:16:12 Jay: Explains why he voted against the stimulus bill that he sponsored. We weep in sympathy. We love you Jay.
01:18:55 Audience: We want transparency in government. HR 1207 - audit the FED.
01:20:00 Jay: My name will be on that by 10AM Tuesday morning.
01:20:19 Audience: Stimulus bill was missing some things. Get with me and explain retirement for single COBRA people.
01:22:20 Jay: for individual issues - contact my staff.
01:22:40 Audience: Social Security Tax Limit raising - why do we have a limit on how much SSN tax we pay?
01:23:40 Jay: "I favor a progressive tax system"
01:23:42 Sandy: Thanks Jay. See the third plank of the communist manifesto.
01:24:00 Jay: Talks about Obama moving for a more progressive imcome tax scale.
01:25:16 Sandy: Jay votes for theft.
01:28:10 Audience: Cap and Trade: CO2 and Climate connection has never been proven. (boos and cheers) Petition of 32,000+ scientists to make this point. You are being unfair and non-democratic not to listen to this side of the debate. (boos and cheers)
01:29:47 Jay: "Apparently people think we will have an applause meter."
01:30:11 Jay: Its really regetable that the debate about CO2 got tinged by politics.
01:30:57 I went to a NOAA ship about 3 months ago. They studied the ocean conditions off the coast. They looked at the acidity of the water. The ocean water is becomming much more acidic due to CO2. The oceans are 30% more acidic than before the industrial age. Nobody disputes these acidic conditions in the water. Some of those effects COULD be - suppressing life that creates calcium carbonate. If you cange the pH enough, you can percipitate it into a calcium carbonate structure. Note the Virgin Islands coral reef is dead due to the warming of the water and perhapse due to the pH change of the water. If you don't believe in global warming, think about this acidification issue. Salmon depond on planktion for their food. (applause)
01:35:47 So what do we do about it? When we think of this issue, we need to think of it as an ecconomic opportunity. We are in a race to create jobs for the future. We are now in a race with China to see who will build electric cars. Danes have wind turbines. Germans have surpassed us in solar energy. We need to look at this as a race to make America the leader in clean energy. I want to create the policies to help us create these jobs. This bill would level the playing field between the fossil fuel industries and the clean energies. The CO2 tax equalizes this playing field.
01:38:52 Sandy: comments
01:45:40 Audience: It feels like the taxpayers are almost like those movies with the slaves in the lower decks running the ship. If the workers stop - we are dead. Are the rich going to make sacrafices to keep the workers alive?
01:48:15 Jay: No. In congress I've learned about greed. Enron for example. We have poor people who can't pay their energy bills while your market manipulations make you millions? "You don't understand ecconomics." The executives must recognize the public interest. Now they are getting the benefit of taxpayer money they need to be more responsible.
01:50:28 Sandy: Jay is right. That with the government subsidizes - it controls.
01:52:04 Sandy: Example from highschool - the robber barons.
01:56:15 Jay: I am very disturbed about the education layoffs going on now.
01:56:21 Audience: Student loans - canned to save 94Billion
01:56:46 Jay: Yes I believe it has the capacity to increase available funds for student loans.
01:57:04 Audience: Credit rating agencies. Bonds for corporations and municipalites are different.
01:57:55 Jay: send me more info.
01:58:00 Jay: open floor
01:58:10 Audience: Grid systems for electric cars.
01:58:50 Jay: we can't use all the electrictiy we can produce without a better grid system. Backstop siteing authorities. Electric cars - we need them.
02:00:00 Jay: There are amazing advances in technology to enable electric cars. I'm glad I got $2Billion into the stimulus package to support electric cars.
02:00:30 Sandy: You're right but centralized methods of advancing progress are way to slow to keep up with technology changes. Besides, its against the law for the federal government to be involved in energy production - if you want this, support a constitutional emmendment and let 3/4 of the nation choose to turn this nation into a socialist state legally. Stop going around the law Jay!
02:04:04 Mary Whitmore: Social Security Tax Cap: The vast majority of americans pay on every $ they earn but to the top 1% it's just spare change. Its unfair.
02:05:00 I and Obama are looking for a more progressive tax system.
02:05:30 Audience: What is your position on term limits? What will happen to the Gitmo detainees?
02:06:15 Jay: I believe in the old fashion term limits - as long as they are doing a good job, let them stay. Not so for the president though.
02:06:55 Sandy: right on Jay!
02:07:00 Jay: Its important to the rest of the world that we not have Gitmo. The world want's us to be the leaders in democracy.
02:07:37 Sandy: Its a republic not a democracy.
02:08:30 Jay: We lost that special place in the eyes of the world. We lost touch with common sense due to fear and we didn't always follow the law.
02:08:53 Sandy: an amazing quote Jay. amazing.
02:09:25 Jay: Gitmo is a symbol of lawlessness - so its good to close Gitmo.
02:09:53 Tamera: Citizen Safety: Loss of Credit is putting a lot of people on the streets. Car accidents. Do you support our state Sovreignty? The people of the state dictating where our national guard goes to.
02:11:26 Jay: I support states doing what the constituion says which is to provide services to their state citizens as they see fit to provide.
02:11:56 Sandy: What constitution are you reading Jay?
02:12:36 Jay: I do not support state sovreignty to allow slavery in Georgia or the pole tax in Mississippi, or to refuse employment based on sexual gender. So there are individual rights that exceed the state's rights.
02:13:18 Sandy: I thought the question was clear. States do have the right to maintain their own militias and you have cleverly equated that with infringing on individual rights and then changed the subject - nice move Jay.
02:14:54 Audience: Are you familiar with everify? It matches a person's name with an SSN. Will you support everify?
02:16:08 Jay: Sounds worthy of my time. Having seen the multiple foulups in government databases I want to make sure it works.
02:17:41 Jay: Border patrol issue: we have significantly improved our border interdiction and it has been expensive to do.
02:18:26 Audience: Do you support union card check?
02:!8:50 Jay: I support us going back to how it was before 1974. I support choice in union participation. Law firms are stopping people from choosing to be in a union.
02:20:20 Audience: What about Nuclear Power?
02:21:16 Jay: Nuclear power has not blossomed in the last 25 years. But it is not because of Jame Fonda or Congress - it just costs too much money. Other methods are just easier with efficiency measures.
02:22:27 Jay: Congress in the last 20 years has tried to enhance nuclear power - we provided $ for research and free insurance to promot it. It is a potential part of our future - if the price comes down dramatically. Smaller plants that are more customized. We need standardized plants to bring down costs. We need a permanant disposal system.
02:24:29 Audience: If france is doing it why can't we?
02:24:43 Jay: France doesn't have a 10000 year solution for disposal.
02:25:03 Sandy: My comments on nuc power - over regulated but Jay has valid points. I think we have much better energy sources comming soon.
02:31:25 Audience: Obama wants us to step up to the plate. The government then sets the goals and asks us to help. How do we help?
02:32:25 Jay: The energy core and the service act helps local governments foster local volunteer activity.
02:33:22 Audience: Imigration debate: is covering up the issue of hireing skill labor from overseas.
02:33:59 Jay: There is ecconomic power in bringing in skilled people from other places. A huge benefit to US. We may lose companies like Microsoft if we don't bring the workers here. We want to identify which workers are necessary to bring in. I think we can improve this by: having more transparency and giving people more confidence that we aren't bringing in people to lower wages here.
02:36:17 Audience: How do you feel about our right to keep and bear arms? (applause)
02:36:35 Jay: "My son is a hunter and a fisherman." I support it for recreation and self defence purposes.
02:37:11 Audience: The guns are to stop the government.
02:37:33 Jay: There are reasonable things people can do to prevent people from being shot up. Convicted fellons should not have access to firearms. People should not fear that taking common sense actions like this threaten the rest of us.
02:39:14 Sandy: See the Pensylvania Minority Report for what the constitution means.
02:42:34 Jay: Thankyou. I hope you will look at this as a dialog. I get 1000 communications a week from my constituents.
02:43:26 Sandy: Closing comments. Use OpenCongress.org!

Monday, February 25, 2008

Principles In Liberty 13

Finishing off the Pensylvania Minority Report

download
Summary:
Recorded on 2/22/2008 and 2/25/2008

Continuing reading of the Pensylvania Minority Report from the Anti-Federalist Papers
00:29 Intro.
00:50 Trial by Jury
01:15 Civil courts too expensive - wealthy will prevail
01:32 Blackstone site: Issue over an Ox cost ridiculous amounts of time and money back in england.
02:50 Civil courts, especially appeals with be prohibitivly expensive for the average man.
03:40 Trial by Jury in criminal cases can be avoided by Civil proceedings.
04:23 No provision for trial to be in the same county as the crime.
04:44 Judges may not be unbiased due to fees and other instruments in place.
05:05 My case - traffic court fees go to the judges pension
05:41 Some comments on jury trial by me
06:30 Civil vs Common Law - my attempts to understand this
08:07 Mixture of powers allowed in constitution.
08:36 Judges appointed by Executive and Senate
08:49 Senate has treaty power to override constitution and state laws.
09:30 Only a relatively few people control this power thus open to corruption and control
10:06 Senate presides over impeachments - what about the senate itself?
10:42 Montesque: separation of powers absolutely necessary for freedom.
11:54 President is dangerously connected with the senate
12:13 Power of pardoning can be used to free co-actors in evil acts.
12:33 Small independent council recommended to rule on any executive step.
12:50 My Comments about pardons going on now.
13:36 Direct taxing power can override all other taxes and endanger private property rights.
14:12 My comments - no limit on tax amounts or modes.
14:30 What if we had % tax limits?
15:13 No control by the states on federal taxes.
15:50 Reps will not be responsive to the people.
16:20 Keeping reps tied closely to the people helps prevent them from passing opressive laws.
16:48 My comments - Our congressmen don't use our SSN system - but use their own pension system.
18:05 Not enough reps - too many people represented by each. They won't really represent the people.
19:45 My Comments - we got the bill of rights so it didn't decay as fast as they had expected.
20:33 Congress will not posess the confidence of the people, requireing armys to compell obedience to the laws.
21:35 A standing army (militia) is a big problem.
22:10 My Comments - militia may eventually be used to take our own property.
22:58 Militia could compell militias of one state to oppress the citizens of others.
23:30 Contientous objectors were honored in the revoluntionary war but may not be for the militia.
24:02 Militia may be used to extinguish the last struggles of liberty.
24:43 My comments - militia used to divide the people.
25:10 They think this is all planned to destroy liberty.
25:40 Swarms of officers will devour the land.
26:05 Summary - these are only our largest objections of a general nature only.
26:45 End of the Minority Report: My comments
27:37 We are never taught in public school about the confederacy prior to the constitution for comparison.
28:34 We rarely study the state constitutions in school either.