Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Friday, August 21, 2015

Another open letter to my congressman


I use this blog as a way to make a decent sized communication with my congressman possible and to keep a record of what I told him - neither feature of which is supported by the standard lame congressional webpage communications form.  By referencing this blog article in his communication form, I can articulate to him and anyone else that is interested, what I said.

This letter addresses our recent fire issues in the Kamiah, Kooskia area.

8/21/2015

Dear Congressman Labrador,

The devastation that happened in Kamiah over the past week is, I believe, primarily caused by government control and ownership of our lands and fire response systems.  

I know a friend in the area that took pictures of one of the original fires when it was only a few acres in size and called it in at that time.  I understand that the lightning storm ignited many fires that day so I don't mean to oversimplify things, but the response time was days and that very fire took out many homes itself.  Citizens that might have taken action upon seeing the fire did not. Why?  Because they had a professional, well funded firefighting force paid for by their taxes to do that job for them.

From attending various fire meetings and discussing the situation with long time locals, it appears to me there is a callous and infectious tendency towards egotistical isolationism.  People with information don't share it and it appears that the reason is that information is power.  People with authority don't delegate it empower others to act for fear of losing 'control'.  Even our local volunteer fire teams have a superior attitude toward non-professional paid firefighters. 

I heard of a situation where a local fire team was contacting the state to get assistance and the state team was more concerned with where the local team got a state-owned radio than they were with getting assistance on the fire.

I was told that $5 million was spent by government on the fire before a single professional firefighter engaged a single fire.

I have also heard of many stories of professional firefighters getting in the way or blocking progress or ordering people off a fire or simply standing and watching and sometimes mocking or laughing at local non-paid firefighters.

I think the problem is clear - when you pay someone to do a job like firefighting on an hourly basis with lucrative rates, you create people that 'manage' the fire instead of teams that 'kill' fires on contact.  The motivation becomes to actually create enough property damage to get the situation into the lucrative 'emergency status' which enables a locality to legally plunder the entire nation.  It is the communist idea of 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need'.

I can understand this is a very complex problem.  How do you motivate professionals to 'work themselves out of a job'?  It's a problem that I think fits exactly the proper role of a good legislator - don't make laws to solve problems, make laws to allow and motivate individuals to solve them for themselves.

So here is my two-cent solution to our problem:

Let's pay firefighters a percentage of what they now earn hourly so they can take care of themselves while fighting fires.  Then, after the emergency is over, calculate the lost tax revenue for a year caused by the fire using the previous years data and subtract that from the remainder percentage they would receive had no loss of property been done by the fire.

In other words, if a team of professional firefighters engages a fire and put it out and only lose, say, a field of hay, the previous year's tax revenue that field yielded to the county is split between the team members and deducted from the remainder of the pay they are to receive.

This motivates every single professional firefighter to be as efficient as possible and encourages reasonable risk to accomplish the goal.  If a fire gets big, the team gets larger and the losses are shared but not equally.  The people that were on the fire when it was small pay for the damage the small fires caused and those that arrived later pay for the damage that was caused on their watch shared with all that are fighting the fire.  Everyone at all times is motivated to stop the damage - not manage the fire into lucrative profits.

Loss of life is not calculated here but needs to be added in.  If a person dies due to a professional firefighter decision, no bonus is given to the people responsible.  This creates a strong incentive for safety yet allows risks to be taken if needed without extreme consequences for an honest mistake.

Another serious problem our firefighters deal with is tort issues.  Allowing a civilian to actively take part in fighting a fire incurs a huge risk in the legal realm to whoever makes that decision.  A lawyer can take your life from you for an honest mistake - this is the ever increasing weakness of our nation - a loss of justice and common sense in judicial review with ridiculous consequences that hamper risk taking and effective operations.

The solution to this problem, as is discussed at length elsewhere in this blog, is really a return to the common law way of doing things.  The main solution being the un-meddled with, randomly and frequently chosen, jury.  The power of deciding constitutionality should be with the people, not with a judge.  The final say in a case should be with the jury not with a judge.  Appeals are costly and flawed in that they rarely get at real justice and often thwart it and delay justice being done.  

Why not simply hold juries accountable for their decisions by another jury and allow the case decision to be final? If you condemned an innocent man by your lame decision on a jury, you face his penalty at the hands of another jury.  The case remains finally settled but the jury pays for its mistake.  (This wouldn't be a bad idea for Judges either)

I know this is pretty radical thinking but if our justice system continues to erode into the money making machine it has become, peace and order in our society is doomed.

Tough problems I know, but we need leadership to step up and stop this trend to self destruction. Communities like Kamiah with their strong sense of honor and cooperation will be eventually destroyed by bean counters, politicians, attorneys and power jockeys.  Responsibility needs to lie with the individual and the individual needs to be empowered to make decisions freely and reap consequences dictated by their peers, not by professional paid judges.

Our fire losses are, for the most part, caused by our poor justice system and congress can fix this by limiting the jurisdiction of higher courts and empowering lower courts to use common law principles and juries.

Monday, October 20, 2014

The pin/chip EBT scam - corruption beyond repair

Obama's recent executive order to have your tax dollars pay for Citi-Bank's upgrade of their credit-card system is almost as bad as TARP yet was not covered by mainstream media in the least.

I just learned about this atrocity from the No Agenda Show.  You can hear the appropriate part by downloading the show and going to the 1:20:36 time-point. (till 1:32:46 = 12 minutes 10 seconds long)
In summary here's what happened:
Obama just signed an executive order to have the US Treasury make a plan to upgrade our EBT credit card system to use chips as is now used in Europe. (cost - way more than the annual cost of credit card fraud).  What this order does is:

  • Update all government EBT credit card terminals to use the upgraded system.
  • Replace EBT procedures to use the newer cards
  • Transfer cracked credentials to the government
  • Create the Buy Secure initiative.
  • Ensure federal investigators can report stolen credentials with other companies (Home Depot, Walmart etc.)
  • Support credit score transparency via Citi Bank credit cards
Ok so here is what this means:

The Government, who decided to utilize a credit card system to support their welfare EBT funds disbursement, is now footing the bill to upgrade this insecure system on behalf of the private company (Citi Bank) that owns the newer technology and at the same time is giving itself and other companies access to YOUR CREDIT CARD CREDENTIALS (passwords/pins).  
Normally, when a company creates a system that is BROKEN (as our current credit card system is - proven by all the identity theft going on) it is liable for its mistakes and must foot the bill both for the cost of its mistakes and for its correction.  This is the natural free-enterprise way that goods and service quality is maintained - do it right, or go out of business and let the competition do it right.
So what this accomplishes is it:

  • Removes responsibility for identity theft from the private corporations that made it so easy to do.
  • Pays for the fix by the most inefficient means (government funding).
  • Charges the taxpayer for this.
  • Breaches security further by sharing credentials with the government and other corporations.
  • Adds more regulations and forces you to adhere to new security standards enforced by law. 
What is more, this is being done by Executive Order which is inherently unconstitutional and was created by Lincoln in time of war for an emergency.
What is more is that the media covered Obama's jokes but nothing about what he was signing.

Send a link of this article to your congressman and urge him to not only rescind this executive order (Congress only has 30 days to do so or it becomes law) and in fact to rescind the whole Executive Order process.  This president is dismantling our freedoms and security with it daily and is charging you for it.

The more power you give government, the more special interests can use that power to their advantage.

Unbelievable.  What a rip off!


Friday, March 14, 2014

An open letter to my congressman


Congressman Raul Labrador is my representative and over-all I cannot complain.  I like the guy and as far as politicians go, this one is pretty good.
One thing I like about Raul is that he frequently sends out emails on what he is up to, and whether or not I like what he does, him telling me what he is up to is a necessary and good thing for him to do.
Here's a sample of the first paragraph of his latest letter, which I am responding to here:
This week, the House took action to ensure that President Obama does not ignore his Constitutional duties and abuse his power.  I joined a majority of my colleagues in voting for H.R. 4138, the Executive Needs to Faithfully Observe and Respect Congressional Enactments of the Law (ENFORCE the Law) Act.  This bill would grant the House or Senate the authority to file a lawsuit against the executive branch for failure to faithfully execute the laws.  I am a cosponsor of this bill. 
I appreciate my representative watching the executive and making sure he doesn't abuse his power or neglect his duties.  However....
Congress is probably the most out-of-line branch of our federal government and has been for the longest time.
Top 3 things Congress should correct

  1. Repeal the Executive Order power granted to Lincoln by Congress in the 1860s.  After all, the Constitution says "Congress shall make all laws" and "all" usually means ALL!  Delegating this power is a clear and simple violation of the separation of powers (go talk to Feinstein about that one!) 
  2. Repeal the Federal Reserve Act and the Income Tax as both are clearly unconstitutional and VERY damaging to our economy.
  3. Repeal the FDR New Deal agencies (and all agencies created since) as this allows congress to essentially mess with the executive branch besides the point of diluting their control of law and overstepping Federal jurisdiction (see the 10th amendment).
There are, of course, lots more congress could do, but I think these three alone would save this nation from certain doom.
Congress isn't there to pass legislation created by lobbyists paid for my special interests to meddle in every little problem that might be brought before them.  Congress' main job is to perfect the law.  That is, create the smallest amount of law with the least amount of contradictions in the clearest possible form so that even a simple juror can easily apply and judge the law and every American can understand it and easily read it in its entirety in a single lifetime.

So why am I writing this in an open letter on my blog?  
Because I have one more gripe.
The way our congress sets up its web forms for communication with the people is stupid.  
  1. They do not remember my contact information.
  2. They unnecessarily require me to give them a 10 digit zip code.
  3. They do not give out an email address with which I can communicate with them easily once my identity and appropriate status is confirmed.  Doing this allows back-and-forth communication much more easily.
With all the cyber-crap the federal government is doing, why can't they put some resources to improve representative/elector communication?  (A: Because they don't want to!) It is very clear even congress doesn't want too much transparency.

Nuff Said for now.

Sandy